Film Overview
-
Title: Eddington (2025) by Ari Aster
-
Setting: Small-town New Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic
-
Premise: Tension and division between a local sheriff (Joaquin Phoenix) and the town’s mayor (Pedro Pascal), reflecting broader cultural and social fractures in America.
-
Themes: Polarization, the influence of social media, performative activism, the corporatization of crisis, and the psychological weight of 2020.
Cast & Performances
-
Joaquin Phoenix (Sheriff Joe Cross): Widely praised for his layered, committed performance. Considered perfect for the role.
-
Pedro Pascal (Mayor Ted Garcia): Serves as a foil to Phoenix’s sheriff. Also well-cast, though not a co-lead.
-
Emma Stone: Mixed feelings about her casting due to age and tone. Some discussion of alternative casting.
-
Austin Butler: Divisive but ultimately defended. His character is seen as representative of evangelical or conspiracy-driven youth.
-
A recurring homeless man character is discussed as a possible metaphor for society’s ignored truths or the prophetic outsider.
Cinematography & Technical Merits
-
Director of Photography: Darius Khondji (corrected after initially being misattributed to Bruno Delbonnel)
-
Visuals praised as among the best of the year—shot in New Mexico using real locations, lighting used to evoke horror pacing and psychological tension.
-
Stylistic comparisons to Hereditary and Seven.
-
Return of Ari Aster’s visual motifs: isolation, daylight-to-night transitions, and symbolic elevation (e.g., houses on hills).
Genre & Stylistic Notes
-
Described as:
-
“Not quite a horror film, but horror-influenced”
-
A blend of satire, tragedy, psychological thriller, dark comedy, and drama
-
-
Compared to:
-
No Country for Old Men (tone and landscape)
-
Robert Altman’s Nashville (ensemble structure and social chaos)
-
King of Comedy and Taxi Driver (Scorsese comparisons in the spoiler section)
-
-
Rejection of Coen Brothers comparisons as too simplistic
Thematic Analysis (Spoiler Section)
-
Fragmentation of Reality: The main theme is how social media algorithms and performative digital culture drive people apart.
-
Bothsides-ism: The film avoids heroes or villains; it’s more about the system manipulating everyone.
-
Performative Activism: Especially embodied in the youth protest scenes—young people react to national injustices despite their local irrelevance.
-
Corporate Exploitation: A data center being built in the town is the real power move while townsfolk are distracted by culture wars.
-
The Sheriff as a Symbol: Joe Cross embodies both traditional authority and the poisoned populism of social media-age politics.
-
Final Acts of Violence: Symbolize collapse under social pressure and loss of moral compass.
⭐️ Ratings
-
Michael: 4 out of 5 stars – “Bold, sharp, close to perfect…”
-
Dave: 4 out of 5 stars – “Difficult but essential viewing… very funny, deeply human…”
🗣️ Start of Reviews
⏱️ Timestamp: 40:50
-
Michael opens the review section, defending the film’s boldness, satire, and visual style.
-
Emphasizes how the film captures the chaos and performative energy of 2020.
-
Strong praise for the thematic relevance and technical execution.
-
Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars
⏱️ 46:31 – Dave’s Review
-
Compares the emotional weight of Eddington to films like Civil War and No Country for Old Men.
-
Praises the film for humanizing characters and confronting social disintegration.
-
Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars
-
Ends with a call for the film to be recognized as one of the most thought-provoking of the year.
🧠 Start of Thematic Discussion
⏱️ Timestamp: 50:34
“Let’s talk about the cacophony that is this film in our spoiler section…”
-
00:20 – Explores how Eddington portrays social media as a force of division, aligning with Ari Aster’s Wired interview.
-
01:11 – Aster’s quote about telling a coherent story from an incoherent miasma is discussed and praised.
-
02:15 – Dave references a protest scene and critiques performative activism in a majority-white town.
-
04:46 – Joe Cross as a stand-in for embodied social media, broadcasting manipulation via megaphone.
-
06:08 – Dave compares the film to Scorsese’s King of Comedy and Taxi Driver, especially in how antagonists are aggrandized.
-
07:26 – Michael analyzes characters like Sarah, pointing out value systems shaped entirely by online culture.
-
08:13 – Cross and the protesters mirror each other’s rhetoric but cannot communicate—highlighting echo chambers.
-
08:46–12:12 – The unhoused character is explored as a possible prophetic figure. The town ignores real suffering in favor of symbolic outrage.
-
12:25–14:11 – The sheriff’s arc from performative compassion to violence is unpacked. His choices reflect moral confusion and performative politics.