Episode 98: Eddington

Film Overview

  • Title: Eddington (2025) by Ari Aster

  • Setting: Small-town New Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Premise: Tension and division between a local sheriff (Joaquin Phoenix) and the town’s mayor (Pedro Pascal), reflecting broader cultural and social fractures in America.

  • Themes: Polarization, the influence of social media, performative activism, the corporatization of crisis, and the psychological weight of 2020.

Cast & Performances

  • Joaquin Phoenix (Sheriff Joe Cross): Widely praised for his layered, committed performance. Considered perfect for the role.

  • Pedro Pascal (Mayor Ted Garcia): Serves as a foil to Phoenix’s sheriff. Also well-cast, though not a co-lead.

  • Emma Stone: Mixed feelings about her casting due to age and tone. Some discussion of alternative casting.

  • Austin Butler: Divisive but ultimately defended. His character is seen as representative of evangelical or conspiracy-driven youth.

  • A recurring homeless man character is discussed as a possible metaphor for society’s ignored truths or the prophetic outsider.

Cinematography & Technical Merits

  • Director of Photography: Darius Khondji (corrected after initially being misattributed to Bruno Delbonnel)

  • Visuals praised as among the best of the year—shot in New Mexico using real locations, lighting used to evoke horror pacing and psychological tension.

  • Stylistic comparisons to Hereditary and Seven.

  • Return of Ari Aster’s visual motifs: isolation, daylight-to-night transitions, and symbolic elevation (e.g., houses on hills).

Genre & Stylistic Notes

  • Described as:

    • “Not quite a horror film, but horror-influenced”

    • A blend of satire, tragedy, psychological thriller, dark comedy, and drama

  • Compared to:

    • No Country for Old Men (tone and landscape)

    • Robert Altman’s Nashville (ensemble structure and social chaos)

    • King of Comedy and Taxi Driver (Scorsese comparisons in the spoiler section)

  • Rejection of Coen Brothers comparisons as too simplistic

Thematic Analysis (Spoiler Section)

  • Fragmentation of Reality: The main theme is how social media algorithms and performative digital culture drive people apart.

  • Bothsides-ism: The film avoids heroes or villains; it’s more about the system manipulating everyone.

  • Performative Activism: Especially embodied in the youth protest scenes—young people react to national injustices despite their local irrelevance.

  • Corporate Exploitation: A data center being built in the town is the real power move while townsfolk are distracted by culture wars.

  • The Sheriff as a Symbol: Joe Cross embodies both traditional authority and the poisoned populism of social media-age politics.

  • Final Acts of Violence: Symbolize collapse under social pressure and loss of moral compass.

⭐️ Ratings

  • Michael: 4 out of 5 stars – “Bold, sharp, close to perfect…”

  • Dave: 4 out of 5 stars – “Difficult but essential viewing… very funny, deeply human…”

🗣️ Start of Reviews

⏱️ Timestamp: 40:50

  • Michael opens the review section, defending the film’s boldness, satire, and visual style.

  • Emphasizes how the film captures the chaos and performative energy of 2020.

  • Strong praise for the thematic relevance and technical execution.

  • Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars

⏱️ 46:31 – Dave’s Review

  • Compares the emotional weight of Eddington to films like Civil War and No Country for Old Men.

  • Praises the film for humanizing characters and confronting social disintegration.

  • Final rating: 4 out of 5 stars

  • Ends with a call for the film to be recognized as one of the most thought-provoking of the year.

🧠 Start of Thematic Discussion

⏱️ Timestamp: 50:34

“Let’s talk about the cacophony that is this film in our spoiler section…”

  • 00:20 – Explores how Eddington portrays social media as a force of division, aligning with Ari Aster’s Wired interview.

  • 01:11 – Aster’s quote about telling a coherent story from an incoherent miasma is discussed and praised.

  • 02:15 – Dave references a protest scene and critiques performative activism in a majority-white town.

  • 04:46 – Joe Cross as a stand-in for embodied social media, broadcasting manipulation via megaphone.

  • 06:08 – Dave compares the film to Scorsese’s King of Comedy and Taxi Driver, especially in how antagonists are aggrandized.

  • 07:26 – Michael analyzes characters like Sarah, pointing out value systems shaped entirely by online culture.

  • 08:13 – Cross and the protesters mirror each other’s rhetoric but cannot communicate—highlighting echo chambers.

  • 08:46–12:12 – The unhoused character is explored as a possible prophetic figure. The town ignores real suffering in favor of symbolic outrage.

  • 12:25–14:11 – The sheriff’s arc from performative compassion to violence is unpacked. His choices reflect moral confusion and performative politics.